Voting ended at: March 20, 2016, 9 p.m.
Weight after voting: 40.55 / 100.0
Voting was available from the event start and a week after the finish.
50 Dor1s But not too cool as usual. 8 teams solved all tasks wtf
20 xiaohuajiao A little disappointed. 70 is too high for the Codegate Quals this year. Hope to be better next year.
70 Dacat Was happy with this year.
2 zardus The top-point pwnable was a simple format string vuln, in 2016...
40 mak Not the same CODEGATE, easyc challenges - nothing innovative, but still fun
51 phiber Needs a proper flag format.
30 Pharisaeus Easier and shorter than 0CTF so should have less points.
30 Damonsson if 0ctf max weight is 45, then should be max 30
40 Redford All challenges I solved were boring and a bit guessy. They lacked clever and original challenges, last year's CODEGATE was much better.
80 krzywix Good one.
20 nsr Organizers changed, not a top-tier but still playable ctf. Challenges were lacking Innovativeness, diverse design choices spoiled the fun.
50 mastho This CTF doesn't deserve so many points. Last year was way better !
5 Slipper Codegate this year is a joke. The challenges are too lame in 2016, it doesn't deserve so much points. I really miss grayhash and beist :)
1 xiaohuajiao The worst high weight CTF I've met before.
70 Dor1s Nice one this year
