Voting ended at: Nov. 22, 2024, 7 p.m.
Weight after voting: 20.40 / 25.0
Voting was available from the event start and a week after the finish.
20 puckk They added an hour without sufficient notice. Bad and broken stego challenges. The rest very well as every null CTF!
25 DanteVeil They actually have decent tasks.But the organization needs to be improved a lot in order to have smooth experience for the online teams.
21 read_e This was quite difficult, several unsolved challenges
25 1v0t thanks for the CTF really nice
5 null_byte_ Many tasks only in spanish, problems with infra
10 grzechuG3 weird
4 auxzae Good
15 koalajoe Mostly very guessy, sponsor-provided challs that could have used a little QA and polish before deployment. Conference looked fun though
25 securisec .
8 B3d1 Problems with the tasks: poor quality, too many partner advertisements from CTFA, some tasks are in Spanish.
7 kerszi2 Very disappointing CTF :( Half of the tasks were in English, the rest in Spanish. The tasks were categorized by sponsors. WEB crashed :(
7 kerszi2 Very disappointing CTF :( Half of the tasks were in English, the rest in Spanish. The tasks weren't categorized by type, only by sponsors. T
25 N0R37urn buenos retos, gran variedad
25 Juke Very good CTF with lots of challenges! I think it should have more rating though
