Voting ended at: April 13, 2025, 9 p.m.
Weight after voting: 73.67 / 100.0
Voting was available from the event start and a week after the finish.
90 umeK Loved the look and feel of the whole platform. Nicely crafted challenges and a lot of fun
45 olewales This event had weight 100 because apparently last year there were only 3 votes. Well, it isn't worth 100 points.
92 0x90sh Incredible design, cool challenges x)
90 0x6fe1be2 on of the best themed CTFs of the year. Sadly this year the pwn challenges seemed HEAP focused, also Zerodeo was badly timed/too hard.
45 ctfguy -55 for bad crypto , less rev and flexing with your redis 0 day :)
75 TheFlash2k Good challs but Lack of "actual" rev tho.
75 Dudcom Lack of rev and the rev that did exist wasn't fun, the redis zero day chall was in very bad faith imo 24 hr drop & no guidence
10 genni Please never ever again write crypto challenges, just be like Defcon and do not have them altogether, avoids baiting people into playing
69 mebeim I had fun but only because I happened to be lucky and pick the right chall, other comments sum it up pretty well
90 clubby789 Great theme as always, not a fan of release schedule and the zero-day challenge
80 suvoni Atrocious crypto, bad release schedule, the website theme is always nice though. Not 100 weight IMO
54 sy1vi3 qr code challenge was fun, redis 0day chall should not have existed.
90 quasar0147 Some of the crypto was guess (key class used in the melon has a 2^-64 chance of occurring) +104 vs 103 was just unnecessary forced brute
51 zeski Crypto chall quality way bellow what it should be for 100 weight. Redis chall should never exist. Horrible release schedule
10 genni Please never ever again write crypto challenges, just be like Defcon and do not have them altogether, avoids baiting people into playing
100 rewhile High quality
