Voting ended at: March 7, 2016, midnight
Weight after voting: 9.18 / 25.0
Voting was available from the event start and a week after the finish.
20 tezeb There were some organizational issues, but overall task were interesting and challenging.
3 jamieh Very chinese
10 h0twinter I think 10 is a good weighting rate
16 amon I agree with Pharisaeus. It is a step up from the CTFs that received 5 point ratings but not quite the quality of Insomnihack Teaser.
13 quanyang Though the language was an issue, the challenges were challenging. Definitely not as well organised as InsomniHack though.
7 Delirium Much guessing involved, horrible website, horrible orga.
4 cryptator Very slow Transfers; Chinese Language.
10 kopi-c internationalization comparable to HackIM, challenges were better. Still not as good as InsomniHack teaser that got 20
25 _m4gu ctf was actually fine, re task were demanding in some cases
25 1amtom fine, re was challenging, web was mainly guessing, misc was ok apart from pdf guessing, liked it though
25 lpfwr Re tasks were actually pretty good, initial rating was 20, so I'm giving 25 to cover losses from other low votes.
25 krzywix Very good ctf, tasks were very challenging. No guessing, nor luck were involved.
12 amon I agree with Pharisaeus. It is a step up from the CTFs that received 5 point ratings but not quite the quality of Insomnihack Teaser.
5 danitorwS Same rating as HackIM and BreakIn
25 Sugi_B3o i think competition have good challenge, ex: web200 ,crypto 1,2, misc execpt some mistake from organizers about language and service is low
1 arturo182 Broken website, slow transfers, Chinese services used, broken language, guess-the-flag challenges, IRC-only hints. Nothing redeeming in it.
10 WhiteLightning Despite all issues (network, login, language, web ) etc. I've liked this one and had lot of fun. Misc 300 and 400 were great.
2 Damonsson Mixed chinese and english was misunderst.Web challanges were totally guessing.Organizers preferred chinese teams, gave unofficial big hints
2 Fish Rev challs were easy in terms of rev, but required too much guessing. Comm. with organizers was really hard, even for a Chinese speaker.
10 JohnCool Tasks were OK. The website, hardly accessible from Europe. The translation was an issue. It was better than hackIM and Breakin so 10 for me.
3 Zzz Short ver.: Mix of "really nice" and "pure guessing", poor translation (or lack of it), country (IP/SMS) limitations, exclusive IRC hinting.
8 makler2004 Tasks were clever and tricky. Format flag was correct. Please, more English than Chinese. I heard that 8 is a lucky number, so good luck.
1 str http://pastebin.com/pMg2BQfL
10 valis Too much guessing, especially in the web category (web100 was just absurd). Two pwns were ok. Weight voting is a great feature to add, thx!
10 sambeckskhack40 Better than HackIM and BreakIn which had 5 but not as good as Insomnia which had 20.
6 peter50216 Too many guessing, wrong category (crypto 200), multiple solution in RE, bad server, seems that only pwn is normal...
10 cr019283 Main problems were: infrastructure, Chinese and guessing for web. Reversing/pwning were okay. IMHO one level higher than HackIM/BreakIn.
8 193s although some tasks were terrible guessing, much better than HackIM and BreakIn
1 ariel Chinese language, many stupid tasks, problems with team account.
1 n0n3m4 Pretty disappointed by this CTF. Some tasks were stupid, translation was bad. We finally decided to not participate in this "CTF" at all.
10 Pharisaeus Better than HackIM and BreakIn which had 5 but not as good as Insomnia which had 20. There were some stupid tasks but also some decent ones.
3 niklasb Also because a the tasks simply required more guessing than sec skills. Details: http://pastebin.com/4PyLktbZ
5 niklasb Not only because of the language situation, but also because a lot of the tasks simply required more guessing than security skills.
3 stypr At first look the ctf seemed to be decent, but this ctf was fucking annoying as hell. (read http://pastebin.com/S8LLu9iM for more info)
5 solarwind Chinese lang everywhere. Isn't it that difficult to make normal lang switch on site or use only eng in tasks?
5 beched
