Voting ended at: Nov. 28, 2016, 7 a.m.

Weight after voting: 18.90 / 25.0

Voting was available from the event start and a week after the finish.

 


25 Sugi_B3o good ctf


20 cost6 nice ctf


15 eugenekolo Playable. Crypto/Misc/Forensics were just forensics/guessing. Reversing was pretty much the same task 3 times. Pwning was decent. Web was de


25 Alaska47 good ctf


25 Isaac Fine


20 laxa Overall, good ctf


5 lenerd A lot of guessing challenges; counting cats is no crypto


25 hafager Great variety in tasks. Full score even though the forensics were a tad too easy.


15 c03 Some guessing was required


25 ariel many guessing tasks, but as voting is fucked up, then just max it


25 nikhil96sher Nice CTF


15 PieceByPiece Overall quite good CTF. But some challenges were just "guessing" the flag. And crypto was textbook level...


24 cryptator Overall good CTF, but crypto was poor. Also, some services were going down very frequently


25 Sugi_B3o Very nice CTF, I really enjoyed forensic and misc


20 uafio it was fun


25 JLLiS Nice ctf ;)


25 0xacb Very nice CTF, I really enjoyed pwn and reverse


25 ameer Very interesting challenges. Had fun playing this one. Web 200/400 are a bit overkill with a combination of web, crypto and red herrings. Ov


25 Rodbert Really fun CTF. It doesn’t deserve max score, but I will give it as an incentive.


25 saruul +


22 Pyhscript i had fun


20 ValarDragon Many of these challenges relied on alot of guessing. Crypto wasn't really cryptography. Overall I had fun though.


10 defunded meh


25 pzyc0 Very good CTF! A lot of fun and interesting challenges.


25 _m4gu had fun.


10 Hertz Okish


25 krzywix Very good CTF. It was fun.


10 hkr Meh.


25 tenflo Very cool


25 lpfwr it was fun


12 unthinkable too much guessing for my taste, otherwise good ctf


13 noraj We want more security and less stego/guessing, we want better categorized challenges.


25 HAZA9 Interesting CTF even if there was a little too much guessing


25 f4lrik It was very interesting CTF


20 higunwoo Fun, could use more "legit" crypto


22 iangcarroll web200 was interesting, decent web challenges otherwise (though 500 failed near the end)


18 valis Some tasks were interesting, some too easy and some totally broken (web500/fore500). Still, fun CTF and will probably get better next year.


20 zoolander Most pwn were ok. fencepost was way too easy, some crypto didn't seem like crypto at all


5 krx Challs were either way too easy (forensics) or way too vague (misc, "crypto"). Would be a lot more fun if you test/fine tune/balance them


5 andrew_ Web challenges were way too easy for their point value. Web500 had a number of bugs that should've leaked the flag but the challenge was har


20 avery3r Some of the challenges were great and interesting. Others were either too easy for their point value or more of a guessing game.


25 t94j0 A super fun CTF. I think the crypto was actually really good and different from other CTFs


25 borski I thought this was a really good CTF. A couple minor guessing, but overall solid infrastructure, fun and complicated problems, and I learned


10 nazywam solarwind: We can exchange stuff ;) http://allegro.pl/masc-na-bol-dupy-lek-na-wszystkie-problemy-swiata-i4839051203.html


25 solarwind Pharisaeus pm me your post address, will send butthurt cooling device https://youtu.be/hFzWSbxPTyU


10 nazywam Forensics/web challenges were kinda fun, crypto was total bs tho


1 Pharisaeus Very poor, guessing tasks. But if dcua was high then I guess this is apparently "how the CTF should be", who needs real re, pwn or crypto...


25 solarwind average tasks, most crypto/misc/web are really stego/guessing. strange availability and hint policy. in general playable however.