# Crunchy

We are given a small Python program which computes the flag:

def crunchy(n):
if n < 2: return n
return 6 * crunchy(n - 1) + crunchy(n - 2)

g = ... # a _really_ big number
print("Your flag is: INSA{%d}"%(crunchy(g)%100000007))

Running this, of course, won't get us anywhere with the exponentially
slow implementation of `crunchy`. A simple improvement would be to
cache computed vaues of `crunchy(n)`, but that reduces the complexity
to linear, which is still not nearly enough with the hundred-digit

Since `crunchy` is a linear recurrence, we can compute it in
logarithmic time. We can express the mapping from $(c(n), c(n-1))$ to
$(c(n+1), c(n))$ (where $c$ is the function) as a matrix multiplication:

$$ \begin{pmatrix}c(n+1)\\c(n)\end{pmatrix} =
\begin{pmatrix}c(n)\\c(n-1)\end{pmatrix} $$

If we expand the right-hand side of this equation $n-1$ times, we will

$$ \begin{pmatrix}c(n+1)\\c(n)\end{pmatrix} =
\begin{pmatrix}c(1)\\c(0)\end{pmatrix} $$

Since we know the values of $c(1)$ and $c(0)$, all that remains is to
compute the exponentiated matrix. We can do this in
$\mathcal{O}(\log{n})$ multiplications by [repeated
which is completely reasonable for the input value of `g` (a few
hundreds of multiplications).

Note that all multiplications should be done modulo $10^9 + 7$ instead
of only doing so at the end -- otherwise, the intermediate values will
be to large to work with (they grow exponentially).

Original writeup (https://de298.user.srcf.net/writeups/insa/crunchy.html).