Sat, 29 Dec. 2012, 08:00 UTC — Sun, 30 Dec. 2012, 20:00 UTC
An ATAST CTF event.
Official URL: http://www.atast-ctf.net/
54 teams total
|Place||Team||CTF points||Rating points|
|6||Man In The Middle||3184.000||0.000|
|19||Shirley's Bit Brigade||2238.000||0.000|
|30||The DHARMA Initiative||1038.000||0.000|
|32||Cyber Defense Action League||900.000||0.000|
The time listed here is wrong. The website says 12:00 UTC+1. 3 hours later than the time listed here.
Hey, ATAST have restarted ctf after site fuckup, with new tasks. And even managed to complete quals without bigger fuckup. There is some non-completely-random scoreboard, http://www.atast-ctf.net/new/scoreboard.php . Let's give them their 10.0 rating weight :)
And add to that rating scoreboard from http://atast.ctf.su/ :)
Awesome CTF! Really! xD
I already sent this as a feedback, but I think this is the best place to my comment. I support the idea of Konstantin Ilin, our team made a great effort trying to get a good place in both competitions (our goal was to make our way to the top ten of CTF Time). It is unfair because we lost a lot of time and only for a CTF with 0 rating weight. Could you please reconsider the weigth for the event (Just as planned from the beginning)? Thanks :)
why would this be worth points? I totally appreciate the effort, but we were (I believe) in 2nd or 3rd place at midnight, then got reset, and had 0 points, and nobody was around to work on it that day. What is the reasoning for that?
Jeff: because CTFs are not only points and places. CTFs are also fun, and this one was fun for sure. It is wrong to punish ATAST, taking away their rating weight and not publishing scoreboard on CTFtime.
Konstantin Ilin, Daniel Correa: +1
It is necessary. At least, that then it was possible to remember as ATAST CTF was passed
Nice, scoreboard online. Need also rating weight := 10.0 :)
Jeff Crowell +1, this ctf was maybe a little bit fun, but with complete admin absence in IRC and childish decisions like banning us for submitting flag more than once along with MSLC and sec0de I think (maybe others), besides how we woke up and found that we have 0pts after being in top10, I dont see how this could take the same weight as CSCAMP CTF Quals 2012 for example. I suggest 5.0 at max if you really wanna give weight.
+1 weight = 10
+1 Prof Moriarty
ban for submitting flag more than once ..we hope that the next CTF will be better organized !
Sorry, we can't set any rating points for this CTF,
b/c scoreboard is quite ambiguous and some teams were removed w/o particular reason.
Also, CTF is an information security competition, so it's a good courtesy to make this competitions secure and we can't encourage poor organization, because it takes time not only making a CTF, but also participating it.