Sat, 29 Dec. 2012, 08:00 UTC — Sun, 30 Dec. 2012, 20:00 UTC 

On-line

An ATAST CTF event.

Format: Jeopardy Jeopardy

Official URL: http://www.atast-ctf.net/

Future weight: 0.00 

Rating weight: 0.00 



no logo

quals

Are you organizer of this CTF? Please, read this

Scoreboard

54 teams total

PlaceTeamCTF pointsRating points
1 Big-Daddy 3754.0000.000
2 '';!--"<xss>=</xss> 3730.0000.000
3 dcua 3684.0000.000
4 NULL Life 3254.0000.000
5 Cyberguru 3230.0000.000
6 Man In The Middle 3184.0000.000
7 5090 3184.0000.000
8 leo 2900.0000.000
9 ufologists 2784.0000.000
10 sutegoma2 2738.0000.000
11 n00bCTF 2638.0000.000
12 itsgr 2592.0000.000
13 Knightsec 2438.0000.000
14 BalalaikaCr3w 2400.0000.000
15 pure 2392.0000.000
16 Baghali 2330.0000.000
17 Tasteless 2284.0000.000
18 ForbiddenBITS_2 2262.0000.000
19 Shirley's Bit Brigade 2238.0000.000
20 CTF-infinit 2146.0000.000
21 5r0d_s3curity 1942.0000.000
22 PoisonedBytes 1838.0000.000
23 Keysec 1738.0000.000
24 Shine 1642.0000.000
25 botbie 1604.0000.000
26 Koibasta 1584.0000.000
27 LeaveRet 1488.0000.000
28 1338-offbyone 1400.0000.000
29 EpsilonDelta 1250.0000.000
30 The DHARMA Initiative 1038.0000.000
31 captchaflag 988.0000.000
32 Cyber Defense Action League 900.0000.000
33 InfoSec@GUC 892.0000.000
34 xbios 884.0000.000
35 FFF 700.0000.000
36 n0l3ptr 650.0000.000
37 Yozik 638.0000.000
38 BeginBazen 592.0000.000
39 Headump 400.0000.000
40 X 1 392.0000.000
41 Unbreakable### 350.0000.000
42 CureSecure 350.0000.000
43 togoli 292.0000.000
44 Kraut Computing 246.0000.000
45 Glider Swirley 238.0000.000
46 MataHari 208.0000.000
47 IND 200.0000.000
48 Nandy Narwhals 200.0000.000
49 Alternatives 200.0000.000
50 [censored] 184.0000.000
51 mochigoma 150.0000.000
52 ipwnu 100.0000.000
53 *.*null 100.0000.000
54 3x3cUt10n 46.0000.000
dnivra – Dec. 29, 2012, 5:04 a.m.

The time listed here is wrong. The website says 12:00 UTC+1. 3 hours later than the time listed here.


kostya.ilin – Dec. 31, 2012, 12:59 p.m.

Hey, ATAST have restarted ctf after site fuckup, with new tasks. And even managed to complete quals without bigger fuckup. There is some non-completely-random scoreboard, http://www.atast-ctf.net/new/scoreboard.php . Let's give them their 10.0 rating weight :)

And add to that rating scoreboard from http://atast.ctf.su/ :)


cyberguru – Dec. 31, 2012, 1:21 p.m.

Awesome CTF! Really! xD


hds – Dec. 31, 2012, 9:47 p.m.

I already sent this as a feedback, but I think this is the best place to my comment. I support the idea of Konstantin Ilin, our team made a great effort trying to get a good place in both competitions (our goal was to make our way to the top ten of CTF Time). It is unfair because we lost a lot of time and only for a CTF with 0 rating weight. Could you please reconsider the weigth for the event (Just as planned from the beginning)? Thanks :)


crowell – Jan. 1, 2013, 5:07 p.m.

why would this be worth points? I totally appreciate the effort, but we were (I believe) in 2nd or 3rd place at midnight, then got reset, and had 0 points, and nobody was around to work on it that day. What is the reasoning for that?


kostya.ilin – Jan. 1, 2013, 9:12 p.m.

Jeff: because CTFs are not only points and places. CTFs are also fun, and this one was fun for sure. It is wrong to punish ATAST, taking away their rating weight and not publishing scoreboard on CTFtime.


leo – Jan. 2, 2013, 9:12 a.m.

Konstantin Ilin, Daniel Correa: +1
It is necessary. At least, that then it was possible to remember as ATAST CTF was passed


kostya.ilin – Jan. 2, 2013, 4:12 p.m.

Nice, scoreboard online. Need also rating weight := 10.0 :)


Moriarty – Jan. 2, 2013, 6:32 p.m.

Jeff Crowell +1, this ctf was maybe a little bit fun, but with complete admin absence in IRC and childish decisions like banning us for submitting flag more than once along with MSLC and sec0de I think (maybe others), besides how we woke up and found that we have 0pts after being in top10, I dont see how this could take the same weight as CSCAMP CTF Quals 2012 for example. I suggest 5.0 at max if you really wanna give weight.


Dor1s – Jan. 6, 2013, 10:13 a.m.

+1 weight = 10


kmkz – Jan. 15, 2013, 9:18 a.m.

+1 Prof Moriarty
ban for submitting flag more than once ..we hope that the next CTF will be better organized !


root – Jan. 25, 2013, 8:39 a.m.

Sorry, we can't set any rating points for this CTF,
b/c scoreboard is quite ambiguous and some teams were removed w/o particular reason.

Also, CTF is an information security competition, so it's a good courtesy to make this competitions secure and we can't encourage poor organization, because it takes time not only making a CTF, but also participating it.